|
California Lawyers
Be
Afraid. . .Be Very Very Afraid
California -- The Rotten Apple In The Barrel
Did you realize that about 2/3 of the lawyers practicing in California
could not practice in any other state? That's because they did not
graduate from an American Bar Association accredited law school.
[From now on, when I say 'an ABA school' you'll know that I mean
an American Bar Association accredited law school.]
ONLY IN CALIFORNIA are the majority of lawyers from law schools
that couldn't exist in other states. That's why California has so
many awful lawyers. Yes, it probably has more awful lawyers than
all the other states put together. The other states require graduation
from an ABA school to take their bar exam and become licensed in
that state.
The Road To Ruin
How did California get in such a fix? Back in the '60's,
California was growing fast. People were pouring in. The legislature
believed that the ABA schools could not turn out lawyers fast enough.
So the legislature sacrificed quality for quantity. It authorized
schools to be formed to teach law regardless of accreditation. That's
what happened and poorly educated lawyers started pouring out. They're
still pouring out. Many of them are awful lawyers. They account
for most of the lawyers practicing in California.
 |
|
"Lawyers,
I suppose, were children once." --Charles Lamb, English Essayist.
|
 |
The legislature figured that could bar exams could screen out the
poor lawyers. They required a 'baby bar' after the first year of
law school and, of course, the bar exam itself. THAT WAS A BAD
IDEA. A bar exam is not meant to screen out competent lawyers
from incompetent. No more than a band-aid is meant to be a tourniquet.
The bar exam is meant to screen out the oddball good student, apparently
lawyer material, who chokes under pressure. [Choking under pressure
is not a lawyerly quality.] The legislature should have limited
the number of times the bar exam could be taken. Perhaps once or
at most twice. But they didn't you're allowed to take it 100 times.
Don't pick a lawyer from such a group where if 100 take the bar
exam only 40, 50, or 60 pass. For all anyone knows, if those guys
had to pass the bar two times out of three, they never would have
made it. They passed by luck as much as anything. Pick a lawyer
from a group where if 100 such graduates take the bar exam 95 or
more pass. [Yes there are such groups, read on.] These guys didn't
pass by luck.
And don't pick a lawyer who had to take the bar more than once
to get a passing grade.
The Stallions And The Scallions
As I said, the average ABA school graduate [a stallion]
is a better lawyer than the non-ABA school graduate [a scallion].
These non-American Bar Association accredited schools turn out much
worse lawyers on the average than do ABA schools. Why? Because they
do not teach the law. They teach how to pass the bar exam. They'll
be shut down if their pass rate falls too low. They teach a BLACK
LETTER LAW view of the law. Everything is black or white. That's
not the way the real world is and that's not the way the law really
is.
How bad are these non-American Bar Association accredited schools?
I'll give you an example. I went to Loyola School of Law [now Loyola-Marymount].
It is recognized as one of the three best law schools in Southern
California. It is, of course, an ABA school. What is its California
bar exam pass rate? It depends on the class standing of the graduate.
In the last 40 years, Loyola's pass rate for its graduates who ranked
in the top 25% of their class is ONE HUNDRED PER CENT! [100%!]
That's because of two facts:
- Loyola teaches the law, not the bar exam.
- The California bar exam, regarded as perhaps the most difficult
exam to pass in the Country, perhaps the world, is actually an
easy law exam!
It's not comprised of difficult legal questions. It is actually
a time-management exam. It tests the ability of a prospective lawyer
to manage his time. Why? Because most lawyers who become disbarred,
were disbarred because they could not manage their time. They over-committed
and ended up cheating their clients. The bar exam is an exercise
in reducing what you can say yet still put forth the essentials
in the time available. It is designed to protect the public from
malpractice by otherwise good graduates; it is not meant to protect
the public from bad graduates who can become awful lawyers.
 |
|
Why
did New Jersey get all the toxic waste and California all
the awful lawyers? New Jersey got to pick first.
|
 |
Many of those who fail write one question and get 100% on it and
then find they haven't enough time to write the remaining questions
and get a zero on them [and fail the exam]. With enough time, they
would have got 100% on every question, but the time is limited.
An ABA school graduate, like a Loyola graduate, has had to cope
with and successfully answer in law school questions much more difficult
than the bar exam presents. He sees the bar exam questions as basically
easy. He's much more likely to pass the first time because he knows
he's seen worse. [Why just the top 25% do really well? Read "A GOOD
START", below.]
Contrast this record to non-American Bar Association accredited
schools where top-ranked students may well fail the bar exam. In
fact, from my own experience, I can tell you this: While I was teaching
at a State accredited law school, in one class I had the graduating
senior who ranked #1 in the graduating class. I read his final exam
and it rambled on and on without proper argument and without supported
conclusions. I gave him a passing grade since I was new to the school,
but I told the Dean that he would fail the bar exam. The Dean was
upset with me; but after graduation, after the bar exam, and when
the results were in, I was right. He had failed. The Dean asked
me how I knew. How did I know?
So don't gamble with a lawyer who had to sweat the bar exam; require
that the lawyer graduated from an ABA school.
A Good Start

Is that enough? Not really. There were plenty of graduates in
my class who didn't understand the law. As I said, it's only the
top 25% that don't have to sweat the bar exam.
A Little History Please
How come the best law schools still graduate so many questionably
competent lawyers? Economics. Forty years ago, the classic opening
day lecture in an ABA school to the entering class was:
"Look
to your left. Look to your right. Only one of you will graduate."
That's right. Forty years ago the ABA schools flunked out 2/3 of
those they accepted. That assured that only the most probably competent
lawyers graduated. THEY DON'T DO THAT ANYMORE. Now an ABA
school flunks out only about 5% of its entrants.
Social Promotion Ain't Limited to High
School!
Why did it change? Perhaps the non-ABA schools are to blame.
They never flunked out anybody they didn't have to but the answer
is economics. Law schools, whether American Bar Association accredited
or not, cannot afford to flunk out 2/3 of those who enter. It costs
too much to admit students. When ABA schools recognized those economics,
it was easy to rationalize. They thought: 'If an ABA school flunks
out a student that student will just go to a non-ABA school and
graduate. Better they should be in the bottom 25% of an ABA school
than the top 25% of a non-ABA school.' True? Perhaps. Anyway economics
is the real decider. Students are passed so that they can keep paying
the tuition fees.
Is that the only economic effect? Nope. The ABA schools have had
to lower their standards because of competition with non-ABA schools
and because of inflation. They need larger classes. Lower standards
give them what they need. Where they used to admit 3 students now
they admit 4. That means the top 25% of an ABA school's class is
roughly comparable to what the top 33% used to be. LET THE PUBLIC
BEWARE. CAVEAT EMPTOR? CAVEAT YOU!
Here's The Way to Go:
Play the odds. When looking for a lawyer, consider a STALLION
not a SCALLION. Consider a lawyer that graduated from an ABA school.
Is that enough? You know it's not. Consider only a lawyer who graduated
at least in the top 25% of his class. What else? Consider
the other links throughout the site.
|